Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study.

Journal of water and health - 1 Dec 2003

Harwood Valerie J, Wiggins Bruce, Hagedorn Charles, Ellender R D, Gooch Jan, Kern James, Samadpour Mansour, Chapman Annie C H, Robinson Brian J, Thompson Brian C

Abstract excerpt

As part of a larger microbial source tracking (MST) study, several laboratories used library-based, phenotypic subtyping techniques to analyse fecal samples from known sources (human, sewage, cattle, dogs and gulls) and blinded water samples that were contaminated with the fecal sources. The methods used included antibiotic resistance analysis (ARA) of fecal streptococci, enterococci, fecal coliforms and E. coli;...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Birds
Share to California

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Enterobacteriaceae

Share to Enterococcus

Share to False Positive Reactions

Share to Sewage

Share to Streptococcus

Share to Water Microbiology

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 15382721

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study.PMID 15382721Read ↗

Evaluation of microbial source tracking methods using mixed fecal sources in aqueous test samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

A comparative study of culture-independent, library-independent genotypic methods of fecal source tracking.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genotypic-based microbial source tracking methods requiring a host origin database.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of seven protocols to identify fecal contamination sources using Escherichia coli.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Microbial source tracking using metagenomics and other new technologiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Integrated analysis of established and novel microbial and chemical methods for microbial source tracking.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Uneven genotypic diversity of Escherichia coli in fecal sources limits the performance of a library-dependent method of microbial source tracking on the southwestern French Atlantic coast.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Carbon source utilization profiles as a method to identify sources of faecal pollution in water.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Use of composite data sets for source-tracking enterococci in the water column and shoreline interstitial waters on Pensacola Beach, Florida.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Microbial source tracking by DNA sequence analysis of the Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase gene.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Optimization and validation of rep-PCR genotypic libraries for microbial source tracking of environmental Escherichia coli isolates.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Use of viral pathogens and indicators to differentiate between human and non-human fecal contamination in a microbial source tracking comparison study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.