Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of Sewage and Animal Fecal Microbiomes by Using Oligotyping Reveals Potential Human Fecal Indicators in Multiple Taxonomic Groups

1 Aug 2015

Abstract excerpt

Most DNA-based microbial source tracking (MST) approaches target host-associated organisms within the order Bacteroidales, but the gut microbiota of humans and other animals contain organisms from an array of other taxonomic groups that might provide indicators of fecal pollution sources. To discern between human and nonhuman fecal sources, we compared the V6 regions of the 16S rRNA genes detected in fecal...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Fecal contamination and water quality
Share to Gut microbiota and health
Share to Mycobacterium research and diagnosis

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 26231648
DOI: 10.1128/aem.01524-15

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 25 Oct 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of Sewage and Animal Fecal Microbiomes by Using Oligotyping Reveals Potential Human Fecal Indicators in Multiple Taxonomic GroupsPMID 26231648Read ↗

Identification of host-specific Bacteroidales 16S rDNA sequences from human sewage and ruminant feces.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Microbial community analysis and identification of alternative host-specific fecal indicators in fecal and river water samples using pyrosequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sewage Reflects the Microbiomes of Human PopulationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Metagenome-based comparisons of decay rates and host-specificity of fecal microbial communities for improved microbial source trackingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of the Performance of Different Microbial Source Tracking Markers among European and North African RegionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Microbial diversity in freshwater samples and their contaminating human and bovine hostsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Host Distributions of Uncultivated Fecal <i>Bacteroidales</i> Bacteria Reveal Genetic Markers for Fecal Source IdentificationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of human and animal fecal microbiota for microbial source trackingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Performance Characteristics of qPCR Assays Targeting Human- and Ruminant-Associated<i>Bacteroidetes</i>for Microbial Source Tracking across Sixteen Countries on Six ContinentsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of fecal pollution sources in a small northern-plains watershed using PCR and phylogenetic analyses of Bacteroidetes 16S rRNA geneSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of two library-independent microbial source tracking methods to identify sources of fecal contamination in French estuaries.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of molecular community analysis methods for discerning fecal sources and human wasteSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.