Differences between genotyping and phenotyping methods for assessing apolipoprotein(a) size polymorphisms.

doi:10.1515/CCLM.2003.205

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Back to search

Article

Differences between genotyping and phenotyping methods for assessing apolipoprotein(a) size polymorphisms.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine - 1 Oct 2003

Simó Josep M, Camps Jordi, Martín Silvia, Pedro-Botet Juan, Ferré Natalia, Gómez Frederic, Joven Jorge

Abstract excerpt

The aim of the present study was to analyze, on a double-blind basis, the relationships between the apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) gene and protein size polymorphisms in healthy volunteers (n = 99) and patients with premature myocardial infarction (n = 91). Apo(a) genotypes were determined by pulse-field electrophoresis and phenotypes were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-agarose gel electrophoresis. Results...

Topics

Age of Onset
Apolipoproteins
Apoprotein(a)
Case-Control Studies
Coronary Disease
Genotype
Humans
Lipoprotein(a)
Male
Middle Aged
Phenotype
Polymorphism, Genetic

Source

Open in PubMed

Identifiers

PMID: 14580163
DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2003.205

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 30 Aug 2026.

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

discussions

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics