Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of Method 1623 and Cell Culture-PCR for Detection of <i>Cryptosporidium</i> spp. in Source Waters

1 Feb 2003

Abstract excerpt

Analysis of Cryptosporidium occurrence in six watersheds by method 1623 and the integrated cell culture-PCR (CC-PCR) technique provided an opportunity to evaluate these two methods. The average recovery efficiencies were 58.5% for the CC-PCR technique and 72% for method 1623, but the values were not significantly different (P = 0.06). Cryptosporidium oocysts were detected in 60 of 593 samples (10.1%) by method...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Amoebic Infections and Treatments
Share to Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics

Source

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID: 12571019
DOI: 10.1128/aem.69.2.971-979.2003

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of Method 1623 and Cell Culture-PCR for Detection of <i>Cryptosporidium</i> spp. in Source WatersPMID 12571019Read ↗

Potential molecular tools for assessing the public health risk associated with waterborne Cryptosporidium oocysts.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Integrated cryptosporidium assay to determine oocyst density, infectivity, and genotype for risk assessment of source and reuse water.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of Giardia and Cryptosporidium spp. as a microbial source tracking tool for surface water: application in a mixed-use watershed.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Investigating source water Cryptosporidium concentration, species and infectivity rates during rainfall-runoff in a multi-use catchment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Occurrence, source, and human infection potential of cryptosporidium and Giardia spp. in source and tap water in shanghai, china.Semantic proximity Read ↗

<i>Cryptosporidium</i> Propidium Monoazide-PCR, a Molecular Biology-Based Technique for Genotyping of Viable <i>Cryptosporidium</i> OocystsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Tracking host sources of Cryptosporidium spp. in raw water for improved health risk assessment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Understanding human infectious Cryptosporidium risk in drinking water supply catchments.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The detection of Cryptosporidium and the resolution of mixtures of species and genotypes from water.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Spatiotemporal analysis of Cryptosporidium species/genotypes and relationships with other zoonotic pathogens in surface water from mixed-use watersheds.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development and Evaluation of Three Real-Time PCR Assays for Genotyping and Source Tracking Cryptosporidium spp. in Water.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water: effect of the number of samples and analytic replicates on test results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.