Article

Mapping Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Responsible Conduct of Research: A Delphi Study

2026-07-02

Abstract excerpt

<p>Responsible conduct of research (RCR) is imperative for the quality and trustworthiness of research, and the proper functioning of the whole research system. However, the extent to which RCR differs across disciplines is not clear. Currently, many approaches to research and training in RCR are either presented as universally applicable (e.g., international frameworks on research integrity) or discipline-specifi...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: ffbcf3ff-7ba3-5f5b-be25-65960d197924
DOI: 10.31222/osf.io/ukq73_v1

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Mapping Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Responsible Conduct of Research: A Delphi StudyDOI 10.31222/osf.io/ukq73_v1Read

Core Competencies for a Biomedical Laboratory Scientist – a Delphi studySemantic proximity Read

International Multi-stakeholder Consensus Statement on Clinical Trial IntegritySemantic proximity Read

The Ethical Dimension of Peer Review: Insights from Editors of Philosophy Journals in SpainSemantic proximity Read

Mapping Methodology to Identify Research Gaps and Priorities in Existing Scoping Reviews - A Scoping ReviewSemantic proximity Read

Recommendations to strengthen collaboration in treating hip and knee osteoarthritis: a Delphi studySemantic proximity Read

Can process mapping and a multi-site Delphi of perioperative professionals inform our understanding of system-wide factors that may impact operative risk?Semantic proximity Read

Clinical trial learning needs of musculoskeletal researchers: an inter-disciplinary consensus study by the Australia & New Zealand Musculoskeletal Clinical Trials NetworkSemantic proximity Read

Social responsibility, disciplinary moral identity, and not-so-value-free biomedical research(ers)Semantic proximity Read

Exploring cultural and individual differences in the hierarchy of moral concern: Evidence from 41 cultural groupsSemantic proximity Read

Improving Prioritisation Processes for Clinical Practice Guidelines: New Methods and an Evaluation From the National Heart Foundation of Australia.Semantic proximity Read

Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi studySemantic proximity Read

Using Concept Mapping to Develop a Human Rights Based Indicator Framework to Assess Country Efforts to Strengthen Rehabilitation Provision and Policy: The Rehabilitation System Diagnosis and Dialogue (RESYST) FrameworkSemantic proximity Read