Back to search

Article

What have we learned about human reasoning from large reasoning models? Response to de Varda et al.

2026-07-21

Abstract excerpt

<p>de Varda et al (2025) reported that human response times and the number of tokens generated by a range of large reasoning models (LRMs) are correlated across 7 different tasks. The authors took the findings to reflect a “strong alignment” between reasoning effort in LRMs and humans. In response to a critique of Vankov et al. (2026), de Varda et al (2026a) carried out a new series of simulation studies taken to...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
89f5f64d-d304-5350-b360-ae89985f5e29
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/3ef2x_v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
What have we learned about human reasoning from large reasoning models? Response to de Varda et al.DOI 10.31234/osf.io/3ef2x_v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.