Back to search

Article

Auditing missingness and input-outcome circularity in unsupervised clinical phenotyping: an empirical case study in hospitalized traumatic brain injury

2026-08-10

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>**Background:** Routinely collected clinical scale data are increasingly used for unsupervised phenotyping, but two design choices are often under-audited: how missing scale values are handled, and whether variables later interpreted as outcomes were also used to define the clusters. We used a hospitalized traumatic brain injury (TBI) scale dataset as an empirical case study to audit mi...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
db4ab572-5ccb-539e-a51b-5fcc0b5292d9
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10251325/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Auditing missingness and input-outcome circularity in unsupervised clinical phenotyping: an empirical case study in hospitalized traumatic brain injuryDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10251325/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.