Back to search

Article

Evaluating the efficacy of RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 direct approaches in comparison to RNA extraction

2020-06-10

Abstract excerpt

<h4>ABSTRACT</h4> SARS-CoV-2 genetic identification is based on viral RNA extraction prior to RT-qPCR assay, however recent studies support the elimination of the extraction step. Herein, we assessed the RNA extraction necessity, by comparing RT-qPCR efficacy in several direct approaches vs. the gold standard RNA extraction, in detection of SARS-CoV-2 from laboratory samples as well as clinical Oro-nasopharyngeal...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
bbba1efa-7aca-5c1f-8cca-870525c0edab
DOI
10.1101/2020.06.10.144196
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Evaluating the efficacy of RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 direct approaches in comparison to RNA extractionDOI 10.1101/2020.06.10.144196
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.