Back to search

Article

Scoring Two-Part Multiple-Choice Items: An IRT Model Comparison with Implications for Validity Arguments and Process Inference

2026-05-06

Abstract excerpt

<p>Two-part multiple-choice items elicit a content decision and a justifying reason, yet the choice of scoring rule that translates the paired responses into a latent-trait estimate is typically made on practical rather than psychometric grounds. We compare eight scoring models -- Part-1-only 2PL, conjunctive 2PL, partial credit, nominal response, mixed sequential, mixture IRT, attribute-group bifactor GPCM, and e...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
b980e2f0-27ed-5fe0-b4dc-c933b8c33294
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/5mqwk_v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Scoring Two-Part Multiple-Choice Items: An IRT Model Comparison with Implications for Validity Arguments and Process InferenceDOI 10.31234/osf.io/5mqwk_v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.