Back to search

Article

Increasing conflict between intuitions triggers deliberation

2026-04-27

Abstract excerpt

<p>Despite decades of research on human reasoning, a deceptively simple question remains empirically underexplored: what makes us reason? Classical Dual Process Theories (DPTs) struggle with this question because they posit an intuitive System 1 whose outputs are monitored and sometimes overridden by a deliberative System 2. This creates a theoretical paradox: System 2 would need to both detect the need for additi...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
b881d426-8e41-555f-bc54-6b61bddf8a94
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/aj5mt_v3
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Increasing conflict between intuitions triggers deliberationDOI 10.31234/osf.io/aj5mt_v3
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.