Back to search

Article

Evaluating ChatGPT’s Performance in Responding to Questions About Endoscopic Procedures for Patients

2023-06-05

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background and aims</h4> We aimed to assess the accuracy, completeness, and consistency of ChatGPT’s responses to frequently asked questions concerning the management and care of patients receiving endoscopic procedures and to compare its performance to Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4) in providing emotional support. <h4>Methods</h4> Frequently asked questions (N = 117) about esophagogastroduodenos...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
b6a380aa-c2f9-57c0-941e-8ad4cd0704b2
DOI
10.1101/2023.05.31.23290800
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Evaluating ChatGPT’s Performance in Responding to Questions About Endoscopic Procedures for PatientsDOI 10.1101/2023.05.31.23290800
ChatGPT Provides High-Quality Responses to Patient Questions: A Multi-Rater Evaluation by Anesthesiology ExpertsSemantic proximity
Assessing the performance of ChatGPT in answering questions regarding cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinomaSemantic proximity
ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0: A Head to Head Comparison in Generating Pharyngitis Patient GuidesSemantic proximity
Comparison of DeepSeek, ChatGPT-4, and Online Medical Platforms in Addressing Chronic Pancreatitis Related QuestionsSemantic proximity
Readability, Quality, Understandability, and Actionability of ChatGPT Generated GI Patient Education vs AGA Patient CenterSemantic proximity
ChatGPT Goes to Operating Room: Evaluating GPT-4 Performance and Its Potential in Surgical Education and Training in the Era of Large Language ModelsSemantic proximity
Quality and Readability of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions About Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency: A Comparative StudySemantic proximity
Harnessing the Open Access Version of ChatGPT for Enhanced Clinical OpinionsSemantic proximity
Close, But no Cigar: Comparative Evaluation of ChatGPT-4o and OpenAI o1-preview in Answering Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma-Related QuestionsSemantic proximity
Reliability and Clinical Accuracy of ChatGPT in Post-FESS Counselling: A Multi-Reviewer Evaluation.Semantic proximity
Evaluating Capabilities of Large Language Models: Performance of GPT4 on Surgical Knowledge AssessmentsSemantic proximity
Artificial Intelligence in Obstetrics: Evaluating ChatGPT and Google Gemini in Answering Patient QuestionsSemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.