Article

“<i>The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back</i>”: a survey of researchers’ and ethics committee members’ views on research ethics reviews in Australia

2020-07-24

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Objectives</h4> To identify what types of health and medical research could be exempted from a requirement to undergo research ethics reviews in Australia. <h4>Design</h4> A web-based survey. <h4>Setting</h4> Australian-based participants completed the survey online between 10 September and 1 November 2019. <h4>Participants</h4> Active human health and medical researchers and members of Human Research Ethics C...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: b46649da-4bb0-5d4c-888a-155a7ad17748
DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.22.20159533

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

“<i>The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back</i>”: a survey of researchers’ and ethics committee members’ views on research ethics reviews in AustraliaDOI 10.1101/2020.07.22.20159533Read

Trial Forge Guidance 5: ethical considerations in randomised Studies Within A Trial (SWATs)Semantic proximity Read

Are you thinking of establishing a Clinical Ethics Support Service? Lessons from the first 18 months of a new Australian service – A case studySemantic proximity Read

International Multi-stakeholder Consensus Statement on Clinical Trial IntegritySemantic proximity Read

The Challenge of Equipoise: Qualitative Interviews Exploring the Views of Health Professionals and Women With Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancer in a Surgical Randomised Controlled Trial.Semantic proximity Read

Clinical Trial Recruiters’ Experiences Working With Trial Eligibility Criteria: Results of an Exploratory, Cross-sectional, Online SurveySemantic proximity Read

Assessment of the Appropriateness of the i-CONSENT Guideline Recommendations for Improving Understanding of the Informed Consent Process in Clinical StudiesSemantic proximity Read

Perceived Benefits and Risks of Research Involving Terminally Ill Patients: Physicians’ PerspectiveSemantic proximity Read

“I’ve never been asked”: Community perspectives on involvement in genomics researchSemantic proximity Read

Do clinical trials meet current care needs? Views of digestive oncology specialists in Galicia (Spain) using the Delphi methodSemantic proximity Read

Exploring the Inclusion of Under-Served Groups in Trials Methodology Research: An Example from Ethnic Minority Populations’ Views on Deferred ConsentSemantic proximity Read

Consent for the discontinuation of life-prolonging treatment in cancer patients: a retrospective comparative analysis before and after the enforcement of the Life Extension Medical Decision lawSemantic proximity Read

Structural Characteristics of Research Ethics Committees in Japan and Their Relevance to Regulatory Science: A Nationwide Descriptive StudySemantic proximity Read