Article

Do clinical trials meet current care needs? Views of digestive oncology specialists in Galicia (Spain) using the Delphi method

2021-03-12

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background: </h4> In recent years, abundant scientific evidence has been generated based on clinical trials (CT) in the field of oncology. In spite of this, there are still major disagreements among the group when it comes to establishing a treatment and therapies for these kinds of patients. The general objective of this paper is to find out the extent to which decision-making is based on knowledge of the mos...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: c79800a4-72df-5fba-937d-c0015d6eed7f
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-228852/v1

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Do clinical trials meet current care needs? Views of digestive oncology specialists in Galicia (Spain) using the Delphi methodDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-228852/v1Read

Consistency and Quality of ChatGPT Responses Compared to Clinical Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer: A Delphi Approach.Semantic proximity Read

Guide for recommendations on specific drug-related off-label treatment in palliative care: A Group Delphi processSemantic proximity Read

How cancer patients perceive clinical trials (CTs) in the era of CTs: <i>Current perceptional status and differences between common and rare cancers</i>Semantic proximity Read

Creating an appropriate model of advance care planning for women with breast cancer, Delphi methodSemantic proximity Read

International Multi-stakeholder Consensus Statement on Clinical Trial IntegritySemantic proximity Read

Development of a patient-reported ONCOlogical-ROUTinE-Screening (ONCO-ROUTES) procedure and its digital implementation at the University Cancer Center RegensburgSemantic proximity Read

Using a Discrete Choice Experiment to Examine the Factors Influencing Clinical Trial Participation in a Nationally Representative SampleSemantic proximity Read

Does the Second Opinion Directive in Germany reach the patient? A parallel-convergent mixed- methods studySemantic proximity Read

The organization of clinical trials for oncology at IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale" Napoli and the impact of the OECI accreditation process.Semantic proximity Read

Patients' Attitudes Towards the Use of AI-Based Decision Aids for Breast Cancer Treatment Decision-Making: A Qualitative StudySemantic proximity Read

“<i>The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back</i>”: a survey of researchers’ and ethics committee members’ views on research ethics reviews in AustraliaSemantic proximity Read

Clinicians’ Perspective On Oligometastatic Disease: A National Survey.Semantic proximity Read