Article

Institutional Review Boards in Saudi Arabia: The First Survey- Based report on Their Functions and Operations

2022-12-28

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background: </h4> Institutional review boards (IRBs) are formally designated to review, approve, and monitor biomedical research. They are responsible for ensuring that researchers are compliant with the ethical guidelines concerning human research participants. IRBs might face different obstacles that cause delay in their processes or conflicts with investigators. This study aims to report the functions, role...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: ad36e190-c2a8-5159-bfa5-3f8a93906526
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2283198/v1

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Institutional Review Boards in Saudi Arabia: The First Survey- Based report on Their Functions and OperationsDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2283198/v1Read

Structural Characteristics of Research Ethics Committees in Japan and Their Relevance to Regulatory Science: A Nationwide Descriptive StudySemantic proximity Read

The readiness of the Asian research ethics committees in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country surveySemantic proximity Read

Perceptions of Biobanking in Lebanon: Implications for Policy, Ethics, and Regional Research IntegrationSemantic proximity Read

Sustained and Discontinued Operational Changes to Ethics Committees in the Post- Pandemic Era: A Qualitative Study in KenyaSemantic proximity Read

Reporting ethics approval in health and social sciences articles. An audit of adherence to GDPR and national legislationSemantic proximity Read

Investigation on the Occupational Situation of Clinical Research Associates in ChinaSemantic proximity Read

Regulation of Community Advisory Boards During Conduct of Clinical Trials in Uganda; a qualitative study involving StakeholdersSemantic proximity Read

A scoping review of the landscape of ethics review processes during public health emergencies in sub-Saharan AfricaSemantic proximity Read

Open Review and Open Science in The Social Sciences and Humanities: A "Double Blind" Gold StandardSemantic proximity Read

Sustaining Clinical Academic Leadership and Excellence (SCALE): protocol for a mixed‑methods international consensusSemantic proximity Read

Monitoring of Open Science practices: a survey of 10 major medical journalsSemantic proximity Read

Assessing Social Accountability Perspectives among Syrian Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional studySemantic proximity Read