Article

Open Review and Open Science in The Social Sciences and Humanities: A "Double Blind" Gold Standard

2021-06-09

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Openings of research results, datasets, and scientific practices in general are currently being implemented across fields. Especially strongly data-driven areas like medicine are discussing publishing transparency too – in a context where open review formats now dominate. Social sciences and humanities (SSH), in turn, still rely on closed systems. In this study, we draw on 12 semi-struc...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 33848901-750e-51c7-b8c2-ca023f470072
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-582546/v1

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Open Review and Open Science in The Social Sciences and Humanities: A "Double Blind" Gold StandardDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-582546/v1Read

Monitoring of Open Science practices: a survey of 10 major medical journalsSemantic proximity Read

Reporting ethics approval in health and social sciences articles. An audit of adherence to GDPR and national legislationSemantic proximity Read

Ten Simple Rules for Open Health ResearchSemantic proximity Read

A Meta-Research Framework for Transparent, Ethically Accountable Integration of CAMSemantic proximity Read

The Ethical Dimension of Peer Review: Insights from Editors of Philosophy Journals in SpainSemantic proximity Read

The Rise of Open Data Practices Among Bioscientists at the University of EdinburghSemantic proximity Read

Gaming the peer review system: a sophisticated review mill in medicine highlights the need to ensure reviewer integritySemantic proximity Read

How far can AI help with assessing the trustworthiness of clinical trial publications? Review of concepts, methods, and questions.Semantic proximity Read

Open Up: A Survey on Open and Non-anonymized Peer ReviewingSemantic proximity Read

Trust and Trade: Patient Perspectives on the Ethics of Real-World Data MonetisationSemantic proximity Read

Building a sample characteristics table for studies on peer-reviewed publications: Rationale and pipeline developmentSemantic proximity Read

Building a sample characteristics table for studies on peer-reviewed publications: Rationale and pipeline developmentSemantic proximity Read