Back to search

Article

Comparison of in-house SARS-CoV-2 genome extraction procedures. A need for COVID-19 pandemic

2021-03-15

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p><bold>Purpose</bold>: Among the methods used to diagnose COVID-19, those based on genomic detection by q(RT)-PCR are the most sensitive. To perform these assays, a previous genome extraction of the sample is required. The dramatic increase in the number of SARS-CoV-2 detection assays has increased the demand for extraction reagents hindering the supply of commercial reagents. Homemade r...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
9a85d118-e6bf-5d74-a058-fef073affb1e
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-214704/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comparison of in-house SARS-CoV-2 genome extraction procedures. A need for COVID-19 pandemicDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-214704/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.