Back to search

Article

Reinterpreting I2 Thresholds: Toward Context-Specific Heterogeneity Assessment in Evidence Synthesis

2026-02-28

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background: </h4> The Cochrane Handbook’s I 2 categorization system (0-25% ”low”, 25-75% ”moderate”, ≥50% ”high” heterogeneity) serves as the international standard for interpreting heterogeneity in meta-analysis, influencing thousands of systematic reviews annually. Despite its ubiquitous adoption, neither the logical coherence nor the intended analytical function of this system has been systematically exami...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
8fe78056-19d2-5beb-bf38-cecdc0e68a1c
DOI
10.22541/au.177226210.01680055/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Reinterpreting I2 Thresholds: Toward Context-Specific Heterogeneity Assessment in Evidence SynthesisDOI 10.22541/au.177226210.01680055/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.