Back to search

Article

Human Evaluators vs. LLM-as-a-Judge: Toward Scalable, Real-Time Evaluation of GenAI in Global Health

2025-10-28

Abstract excerpt

Evaluating the outputs of generative AI (GenAI) models in healthcare remains a significant bottleneck for the safe and scalable deployment of these tools. Human expert raters remain the gold standard for assessing the accuracy, contextual appropriateness, and empathy of AI-generated responses, but their assessments are costly, inconsistent, and difficult to scale. The concept of “LLM-as-a-judge” systems, i.e., AI...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
8e132e20-9b47-53f9-938e-371ed6ccdf75
DOI
10.1101/2025.10.27.25338910
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Human Evaluators vs. LLM-as-a-Judge: Toward Scalable, Real-Time Evaluation of GenAI in Global HealthDOI 10.1101/2025.10.27.25338910
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.