Article

The Random Somatic Mutation is not Quite Random

2023-11-17

Abstract excerpt

This research note challenges the idea that Random Somatic Mutations are entirely random, highlighting their non-equiprobable nature and their influence on evolution, involution, or indeterminacy. It recalls the Neutrosophic Theory of Evolution, extending Darwin’s theory, and emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between different senses of “random mutation” in evolutionary theory.

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 890cb050-aff8-582d-9c45-b32cbc37a77f
DOI: 10.32388/9noo3j

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The Random Somatic Mutation is not Quite RandomDOI 10.32388/9noo3jRead

"Mistakes happen": somatic mutation and disease.Semantic proximity Read

Somatic hypermutation: Another piece in the hypermutation puzzle.Semantic proximity Read

Quasi-neutral molecular evolution — When positive and negative selection cancel outSemantic proximity Read

The somatic mutation theory of ageing.Semantic proximity Read

[The impact of neutral mutations on genome evolvability].Semantic proximity Read

Foundational errors in the Neutral and Nearly-Neutral theories of evolution in relation to the Synthetic Theory: is a new evolutionary paradigm necessary?Semantic proximity Read

Random variations, gradualism and the role of natural selection.Semantic proximity Read

Neutral evolution of rare cancer mutations in the computer and the clinic.Semantic proximity Read

The somatic marker hypothesis: still many questions but no answersSemantic proximity Read

Error-Prone Candidates Vie for Somatic MutationSemantic proximity Read

On a logical difficulty in the directed mutation debate.Semantic proximity Read

Tumorigenesis as the Paradigm of Quasi-neutral Molecular Evolution.Semantic proximity Read