Back to search

Article

How statistical challenges and misreadings of the literature combine to produce unreplicable science: An example from psychology

2024-05-14

Abstract excerpt

<p>Given the well-known problems of replicability, how is it that researchers at respected institutions continue to publish and publicize studies that are fatally flawed in the sense of not providing evidence to support their strong claims? We argue that two general problems are: (a) difficulties of analyzing data with multilevel structure and (b) misinterpretation of the literature. We demonstrate with the exampl...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
6ac9ddc4-7ba3-56a5-9a22-e5ac2afa2c0f
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/ekmdf
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
How statistical challenges and misreadings of the literature combine to produce unreplicable science: An example from psychologyDOI 10.31234/osf.io/ekmdf
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.