Back to search

Article

<strong>Bias, Confounding, Multiplicity and <em>Researchers&rsquo; Degrees of Freedom</em> Combined with Segmented Publications are not Likely to Provide Accurate Estimates of Reality: A Case Study of Two Candidate-Gene Association Reports in the First Episode Psychosis Patients</strong>

2020-06-18

Abstract excerpt

Estimation of the reality can easily be flawed, hence, in order to result in accurate and useful estimates the process has to be protected from bias and confounding and should follow other methodological milestones inherent to different types of empirical observations. Candidate-gene association studies are a specific form of observations that have been rather extensively applied in psychiatry yielding valuable in...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
4e360c5d-babb-5e86-bf82-8a2f3393de0a
DOI
10.20944/preprints202006.0226.v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
<strong>Bias, Confounding, Multiplicity and <em>Researchers&rsquo; Degrees of Freedom</em> Combined with Segmented Publications are not Likely to Provide Accurate Estimates of Reality: A Case Study of Two Candidate-Gene Association Reports in the First Episode Psychosis Patients</strong>DOI 10.20944/preprints202006.0226.v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.