Back to search

Article

Underestimation of Luminal Eosinophilia by Quantitative Sputum Cytometry

2021-03-15

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p><bold>Rationale: </bold>On Wright-stained sputum cytospins, eosinophil differential of >1.2% is considered abnormal and ≥3% clinically relevant. We hypothesized that failure to consider free eosinophil granules (FEG), and the re-emergence of eosinophilia (at ≥1.2 and ≥2.3%) underestimate the prevalence of the eosinophilic phenotype.<bold>Methods:</bold> This is a retrospective analysis...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
3e06a78a-9dc1-5084-ba8d-9971de9025bb
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-297911/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Underestimation of Luminal Eosinophilia by Quantitative Sputum CytometryDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-297911/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.