Back to search

Article

A Comparison of Manual and Automated Approaches to Developing Computable Algorithms for Identifying Acute Pancreatitis

2026-06-08

Abstract excerpt

<h4>ABSTRACT</h4> <h4>Objective</h4> Clinical phenotyping methods that rely on clinical and informatics expertise can be time-intensive and costly. We tested both manual and highly automated approaches using electronic health record (EHR) data to identify an FDA Sentinel Initiative health outcome of interest, acute pancreatitis. <h4>Materials and Methods</h4> We trained and evaluated machine learning algorithms...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
172d4c84-0ca2-501f-b8a2-3b8e9ed09511
DOI
10.64898/2026.06.05.26354934
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
A Comparison of Manual and Automated Approaches to Developing Computable Algorithms for Identifying Acute PancreatitisDOI 10.64898/2026.06.05.26354934
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.