Back to search

Article

Predictive structure or paradigm size? Investigating the effects of i-complexity and e-complexity on the learnability of morphological systems

2020-09-15

Abstract excerpt

<p>Research on cross-linguistic differences in morphological paradigms reveals a wide range of variation on many dimensions, including the number of categories expressed, the number of unique forms, and the number of inflectional classes. However, in an influential paper, Ackerman &amp; Malouf (2013) argue that there is one dimension on which languages do not differ widely: in predictive structure. Predictive stru...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
0c1e7e60-79c7-5f80-8d88-f7c813910983
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/qns6v
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Predictive structure or paradigm size? Investigating the effects of i-complexity and e-complexity on the learnability of morphological systemsDOI 10.31234/osf.io/qns6v
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.