Comparison of genetic susceptibility to experimental allergic/immune-mediated blepharoconjunctivitis between Lewis and Fischer rats.

doi:10.1007/s004170050171

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Back to search

Article

Comparison of genetic susceptibility to experimental allergic/immune-mediated blepharoconjunctivitis between Lewis and Fischer rats.

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie - 1 Nov 1998

Yoshida O, Yoshida H, Iwamoto H, Nishino K, Fukushima A, Ueno H

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Fischer rats were less susceptible to experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis (EAU) than Lewis rats, although both strains have the same MHC molecules. The purpose of this study was to compare the susceptibility of experimental allergic/immune-mediated blepharoconjunctivitis (EAC) betwe...

Topics

Allergens
Animals
Antibody Formation
Blepharitis
Cells, Cultured
Conjunctivitis
Cytokines
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Flow Cytometry
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Immunity, Cellular
Lymph Nodes
Lymphocyte Activation
Male
Ovalbumin
Peptide Fragments
Rats
Rats, Inbred F344

Source

Open in PubMed

Identifiers

PMID: 9825262
DOI: 10.1007/s004170050171

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 30 Aug 2026. Prepared record publication-9825262-2026-08-30.1. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-08-30.1.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 30 Aug 2026.

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

discussions

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics