Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Repeatability of taste panel tenderness scores and their relationships to objective pig meat quality traits.

Journal of animal science - 1 Aug 1993

Hovenier R, Kanis E, Verhoeven J A

Abstract excerpt

Repeatabilities of 12 meat quality measurements were calculated as a value for the accuracy of those measurements. Sixty-four Duroc and Dutch Yorkshire boars and gilts were slaughtered during 8 wk. The repeatabilities between carcass halves within animals were .53 for repeated taste panel tenderness scores based on 12.4 observations of different panelists per mean, .08 for two repeated tenderness scores of...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Meat
Share to Phenotype

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 8376224
DOI: 10.2527/1993.7182018x

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 8 closest

Repeatability of taste panel tenderness scores and their relationships to objective pig meat quality traits.PMID 8376224Read ↗

Biochemical measurements of beef are a good predictor of untrained consumer sensory scores across muscles.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of objective measures of beef steak juiciness and their relationships to sensory panel juiciness ratings.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Review: The variability of the eating quality of beef can be reduced by predicting consumer satisfaction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The influence of pork quality traits and muscle fiber characteristics on the eating quality of pork from various breeds.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Associations of sire estimated breeding values and objective meat quality measurements with sensory scores in Australian lamb.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Determination of the effect of brand and product identification on consumer palatability ratings of ground beef patties.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Determinants of meat quality: tenderness.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotypic and genetic correlations of pork myoglobin content with meat colour and other traits in an eight breed-crossed heterogeneous population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.