Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Factors influencing public willingness to participate in population-based hereditary cancer genetic testing: a qualitative study of public preferences.

Familial cancer - 10 Apr 2026

Sanchez-Vazquez Diego R, Avery Jonathan, Qualls Whitney, Bentley Colene, McTaggart-Cowan Helen, McLeod Julianne, Dawson Lesa, Peacock Stuart

Abstract excerpt

Over 97% of individuals with hereditary cancer predisposition remain unidentified, limiting access to life-saving prevention and screening. In British Columbia (BC), access to publicly funded genetic testing is restricted to individuals with a family history of cancer. A novel solution, population-based testing (PBT), would remove the family history requirement, providing unrestricted access for all residents....

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aged
Share to British Columbia

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Qualitative Research

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 41961326
DOI: 10.1007/s10689-026-00555-2

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Factors influencing public willingness to participate in population-based hereditary cancer genetic testing: a qualitative study of public preferences.PMID 41961326Read ↗

Receipt, knowledge, and interest in genetic testing for cancer - National Center for Health Statistics Rapid Surveys System, United States, January-February 2024.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Public Views on Genetics and Genetic Testing: A Survey of the General Public in Belgium.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Preferences for Genetic Testing to Predict the Risk of Developing Hereditary Cancer: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Factors Associated With the People Preferences for the Breast Cancer Genetic Tests: a Systematic ReviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Intention to Inform Relatives, Rates of Cascade Testing, and Preference for Patient-Mediated Communication in Families Concerned with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndrome: The Swiss CASCADE CohortSemantic proximity Read ↗

Barriers and facilitators for population genetic screening in healthy populations: a systematic reviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of willingness to pay for expanded carrier screening among women and couples undergoing preconception carrier screeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Interventions to support decision making in people considering germline genetic testing for BRCA 1/2 pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants: A scoping review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Acceptability of, and Information Needs Regarding, Next-Generation Sequencing in People Tested for Hereditary Cancer: A Qualitative Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The impact of a mainstream genetic testing pathway and socioeconomic factors on the uptake of germline genetic testing in breast cancer patients: results of the nationwide GENE-SMART studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Public Preferences for Genetic and Genomic Risk-Informed Chronic Disease Screening and Early Detection: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.