Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

An exploration of delegation practices regarding the utilization of genetic counseling assistants for disclosure of genetic testing results

1 Apr 2025

Abstract excerpt

Genetic counselors (GCs) play a crucial role in the healthcare system, providing education, support and guidance regarding genetic risk assessment, testing and results interpretation. To help GCs practice at the highest level of their expertise, the role of the genetic counseling assistant (GCA) was introduced, focusing on tasks like administrative support and patient care coordination. Although GCs typically...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Share to Ethics in Clinical Research
Share to Genomics and Rare Diseases

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 40176356
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.2015

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

An exploration of delegation practices regarding the utilization of genetic counseling assistants for disclosure of genetic testing resultsPMID 40176356Read ↗

Assessing patient communication preferences for reclassified variants of uncertain significance in a general genetics clinic.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic counselors' practices and confidence regarding variant of uncertain significance results and reclassification from BRCA testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Whether, when, how, and how much? General public’s and cancer patients’ views about the disclosure of genomic secondary findingsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic Counselors' Experiences Regarding Communication of Reproductive Risks with Autosomal Recessive Conditions found on Cancer Panels.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Further Defining the Role of the Laboratory Genetic CounselorSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical and laboratory genetic counselor attitudes on the reporting of variants of uncertain significance for multigene cancer panels.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic counselors outside of the genetics clinic: Roles, practices, and ethico‐legal implications in light of lagging legal recognition across CanadaSemantic proximity Read ↗

The duty to warn at-risk relatives-The experience of genetic counselors and medical geneticists.Semantic proximity Read ↗

To disclose, or not to disclose? Perspectives of clinical genomics professionals toward returning incidental findings from genomic researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Whether, when, how, and how much? General public’s and cancer patients’ views about the disclosure of genomic secondary findingsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Critical components of genomic medicine practice for non‐genetics healthcare professionals: Genetic counselors' perspectives and implications for medical educationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic counselors' and community clinicians' implementation and perceived barriers to informed consent during pre-test counseling for hereditary cancer risk.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.