Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genetic counselors' and community clinicians' implementation and perceived barriers to informed consent during pre-test counseling for hereditary cancer risk.

Journal of genetic counseling - 1 Feb 2025

Capasso Alexandra, Nehoray Bita, Gorman Nicholas, Quinn Emily A, Bucio Daiana, Blazer Kathleen R

Abstract excerpt

As demand for genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) continues to increase, so does the sense of urgency to scale up efforts to triage patients, facilitate informed consent, and order genetic testing for cancer risk. The National Society of Genetic Counselors outlines the elements of informed consent that should be addressed in a GCRA session. While this practice resource aims to improve health equity, research on...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to GC gene
Share to Genetic Counseling

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Informed Consent

Share to Neoplasms

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 38480478
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1887
PMCID: PMC11393174

Genes

GC

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genetic counselors' and community clinicians' implementation and perceived barriers to informed consent during pre-test counseling for hereditary cancer risk.PMID 38480478Read ↗

Pre‐test genetic counseling services for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer delivered by non‐genetics professionals in the state of FloridaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Defining the Critical Components of Informed Consent for Genetic TestingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical GeneticistsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Experiences with obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Critical components of genomic medicine practice for non‐genetics healthcare professionals: Genetic counselors' perspectives and implications for medical educationSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Consent for Genetic Testing Using an Oncologist- or Genetic Counselor-Mediated Model of CareSemantic proximity Read ↗

Barriers, interventions, and recommendations: Improving the genetic testing landscapeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: a case study and practical recommendations for “genomic counseling”.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of a framework to guide genetic testing communication across clinical indicationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Not all information is equally important: informed consent to genetic testing for hereditary cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Defining the Critical Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: A Delphi StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests and Canadian Genetic Counselors: A Pilot Exploration of Professional Roles in Response to Novel BiotechnologiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.