Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The duty to warn at-risk relatives-The experience of genetic counselors and medical geneticists.

American journal of medical genetics. Part A - 1 Feb 2020

Perry Tabitha J, Patton Samantha I, Farmer Meagan B, Hurst Christina B, McGwin Gerald, Robin Nathaniel H

Abstract excerpt

Studies published over 15 years ago surveyed genetic counselors (GC) and medical geneticists (MG) to examine their clinical experiences with the conflict of "duty to warn" versus patient confidentiality. Federal and state laws pertaining to medical professionals' duty to warn have since been implemented following the publications of these studies. Using a merged version of surveys employed in the prior studies,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Confidentiality
Share to Disclosure

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Family

Share to Genetic Counseling

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Genetics, Medical

Share to Guidelines as Topic

Share to Physicians

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 31814270
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61425

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The duty to warn at-risk relatives-The experience of genetic counselors and medical geneticists.PMID 31814270Read ↗

Medical geneticists' duty to warn at‐risk relatives for genetic diseaseSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic Information, Non‐Discrimination, and Privacy Protections in Genetic Counseling PracticeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reconsidering the duty to warn genetically at-risk relatives.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Closer Look at the Recommended Criteria for Disclosing Genetic Results: Perspectives of Medical Genetic Specialists, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Board ChairsSemantic proximity Read ↗

“Not Tied Up Neatly with a Bow”: Professionals’ Challenging Cases in Informed Consent for Genomic SequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Consent and confidentiality in clinical genetic practice: guidance on genetic testing and sharing genetic informationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Guidelines for disclosing genetic information to family members: from development to use.Semantic proximity Read ↗

An investigation of genetic counselors' discussion of genetic discrimination with cancer risk patients.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosure of genetic risk in the family: A survey of the Flemish general populationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical and Professional Challenges Posed by Patients with Genetic Concerns: A Report of Focus Group Discussions with Genetic Counselors, Physicians, and NursesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinician perspectives on policy approaches to genetic risk disclosure in families.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Survey of Genetic Counselors' Strategies for Addressing Ethical and Professional Challenges in PracticeSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.