Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing and the changing landscape of gamete donor conception: key issues for practitioners and stakeholders

24 Sept 2023

Abstract excerpt

RESEARCH QUESTION: What effect does direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) have on information finding and sharing in relation to gamete donor conception? DESIGN: This study used in-depth qualitative interviews with parents through donor conception, donors, the relatives of donors and donor-conceived people who have used, or considered using, DTCGT. Interviews were conducted between September 2021 and...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Share to Organ Donation and Transplantation
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 37976658
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103421

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing and the changing landscape of gamete donor conception: key issues for practitioners and stakeholdersPMID 37976658Read ↗

Routes to expanded carrier screening in the UK: the perspectives of professional stakeholdersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Sharing behavior and health care utilization following direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a systematic reviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Sharing behavior and health care utilization following direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a systematic reviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes of sperm, egg and embryo donors and recipients towards genetic information and screening of donorsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Prospective users’ attitudes toward information about ancestry and biological relationshipsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests and Canadian Genetic Counselors: A Pilot Exploration of Professional Roles in Response to Novel BiotechnologiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Donor conception, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, choices, and procedural justice: an argument for reform of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic counseling following direct‐to consumer genetic testing: Consumer perspectivesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Open sharing of genomic data: Who does it and why?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Keeping data alive: talking DTC genetic testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Health professionals contacting patients' relatives directly about genetic risk (with patient consent): current clinical practice and perspectives.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.