Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian public

6 Jun 2023

Abstract excerpt

Genetic risk information for medically actionable conditions has relevance for patients' blood relatives. However, cascade testing uptake in at-risk families is <50%, and the burden of contacting relatives is a significant barrier to dissemination of risk information. Health professionals (HPs) could notify at-risk relatives directly, with patients' consent. This practice is supported by international literature,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Share to Ethics in Clinical Research

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 37280361
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01395-9

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 3 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian publicPMID 37280361Read ↗

Health professionals contacting patients' relatives directly about genetic risk (with patient consent): current clinical practice and perspectives.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patients' perspectives regarding health professionals contacting their relatives about genetic risk directly (with patient consent).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosing genetic information to family members without consent: Five Australian case studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosure of genetic information to at-risk relatives: privacy law and professional guidance in New Zealand.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Public perspectives on healthcare professional-directed communication of hereditary genetic risks: a mixed-method systematic review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

How to inform at-risk relatives? Attitudes of 1379 Dutch patients, relatives, and members of the general population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Consent and confidentiality in clinical genetic practice: guidance on genetic testing and sharing genetic informationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosure of genetic risk in the family: A survey of the Flemish general populationSemantic proximity Read ↗

"I Didn't Have to Worry about It": Patient and Family Experiences with Health System Involvement in Notifying Relatives of Genetic Test Results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Informed consent in direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: the outline of a model between specific and generic consent.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: Where and How Does Genetic Counseling Fit?Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.