Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.

Internal medicine journal - 1 Jan 2014

Savard J, Mooney-Somers J, Newson A J, Kerridge I

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: As direct-to-consumer personal genome testing (DTC-PGT) is increasingly available in Australia, knowledge of Australians' perceptions and attitudes towards this technology is needed in order to assess the (potential) impact it might have on the Australian public and healthcare system. AIMS: To explore the knowledge and perceptions of DTC-PGT in an Australian sample. METHODS: An online survey asking...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Australia
Share to Genetic Testing
Share to Health Care Surveys

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Share to Health Services Accessibility

Share to Internet

Share to Perception

Share to Precision Medicine

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 24450520
DOI: 10.1111/imj.12289

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.PMID 24450520Read ↗

Australians’ views and experience of personal genomic testing: survey findings from the Genioz studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Motivations, Perceptions and Impacts of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Among Users in BrazilSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Prospective users’ attitudes toward information about ancestry and biological relationshipsSemantic proximity Read ↗

General practitioner attitudes to direct-to-consumer genetic testing in New Zealand.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of direct-to-consumer genetic testing on Australian clinical genetics servicesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Primary Care Physicians’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Experience with Personal Genetic TestingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: An assessment of genetic counselors' knowledge and beliefsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian publicSemantic proximity Read ↗

An exploration of genetic health professionals' experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practiceSemantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of Direct‐to‐Consumer Genetic Tests on Health Behaviour and Anxiety: A Survey of Consumers and Potential ConsumersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: perceptions, problems, and policy responses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER GENETIC TESTING: ETHICAL-LEGAL PERSPECTIVES AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONSSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.