Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Australians’ views and experience of personal genomic testing: survey findings from the Genioz study

21 Jan 2019

Abstract excerpt

Personal genomic tests (PGTs) for multiple purposes are marketed to ostensibly healthy people in Australia. These tests are generally marketed and purchased online commercially or can be ordered through a health professional. There has been minimal engagement with Australians about their interest in and experience with ordering a PGT. As part of a multistage, interdisciplinary project, an online survey (Stage 2...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Share to Ethics in Clinical Research
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 30666046
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0325-x

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Australians’ views and experience of personal genomic testing: survey findings from the Genioz studyPMID 30666046Read ↗

Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Motivations, Perceptions and Impacts of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Among Users in BrazilSemantic proximity Read ↗

Utilisation of subsidised genetic and genomic testing in a publicly funded healthcare system 2014–2023Semantic proximity Read ↗

Who defines the “personal utility” of genetic and genomic testing? A systematic reviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: Where and How Does Genetic Counseling Fit?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of direct-to-consumer genetic testing on Australian clinical genetics servicesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: a case study and practical recommendations for “genomic counseling”.Semantic proximity Read ↗

DNA-based screening and personal health: a points to consider statement for individuals and health-care providers from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)Semantic proximity Read ↗

Community concerns about genetic discrimination in life insurance persist in Australia: A survey of consumers offered genetic testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

An Australian mainstream genetic testing program: Clinicians views about current and future practicesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Population-based preconception carrier screening: how potential users from the general population view a test for 50 serious diseasesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetics in the 21st Century: Implications for patients, consumers and citizensSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.