Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Performance of the shared decision-making process scale for use in evaluation of hereditary cancer genetic testing decisions.

Journal of genetic counseling - 1 Oct 2023

Gore Moses Rachel, Nieters Amanda, Valentine K D, Wooters Mackenzie, Wynn Julia, Wardyn Amy, Amendola Laura, Sepucha Karen R, Shannon Kristen M

Abstract excerpt

This study aimed to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, reliability, and validity of the existing four-item Shared Decision Making (SDM) Process Scale for use in evaluating genetic testing decisions. Patients from a large hereditary cancer genetics practice were invited to participate in a two-part survey after completing pre-test genetic counseling. The online survey included the SDM Process Scale and the SURE...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Decision Making
Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Neoplasms

Share to Patient Participation

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 37069832
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1704

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Performance of the shared decision-making process scale for use in evaluation of hereditary cancer genetic testing decisions.PMID 37069832Read ↗

How patients deal with an ambiguous medical test: Decision-making after genetic testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The development of an online decision aid to support persons having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners during reproductive decision-making: a usability and pilot study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

'We don't know for sure': discussion of uncertainty concerning multigene panel testing during initial cancer genetic consultations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Shared decision making and non-directiveness in genetic counsellingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Development of an electronic decision aid tool to facilitate mainstream genetic testing in ovarian cancer patientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of a shared decision making program for women suspected to have a genetic predisposition to breast cancer: preliminary results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Psychometric testing of the decisional conflict scale: genetic testing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Cross-sectional Study of Regret in Cancer Patients After Sharing Test Results for Pathogenic Germline Variants of Hereditary Cancers With Relatives.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Should pretest genetic counselling be required for patients pursuing genomic sequencing? Results from a survey of participants in a large genomic implementation studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Decision making after BRCA genetic testing. Down the road of transition.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Codesign of Lynch ChoicesTM : Using implementation science to create a clinically deliverable patient decision support website to transform cancer genetics care pathways.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development of a haemophilia A gene therapy shared decision‐making tool for cliniciansSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.