Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Dissecting genetic trends to understand breeding practices in livestock: a maternal pig line example.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE - 27 Nov 2021

Abdollahi-Arpanahi Rostam, Lourenco Daniela, Legarra Andres, Misztal Ignacy

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Understanding whether genomic selection has been effective in livestock and when the results of genomic selection became visible are essential questions which we have addressed in this paper. Three criteria were used to identify practices of breeding programs over time: (1) the point of divergence of estimated genetic trends based on pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) versus...

Topics

Animals
Female
Genome
Genotype
Livestock
Male
Models, Genetic
Pedigree
Phenotype
Swine

Source

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 34837954
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-021-00683-6
PMCID: PMC8627101

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 31 Aug 2026.

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

0

discussions

0

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Dissecting genetic trends to understand breeding practices in livestock: a maternal pig line example.PMID 34837954Read ↗

Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent ssGBLUP evaluation of preselected animals for scarcely recorded feed intake in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Changes in genetic parameters for fitness and growth traits in pigs under genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent genetic evaluations with ssGBLUP using real data from pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Determining the stability of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values in future generations in commercial pig populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Twenty years of artificial directional selection have shaped the genome of the Italian Large White pig breed.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using genomic selection to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for multi-populations in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic connectedness and genotype-by-environment interaction in a maternal pig line across countries.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.