Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Not all phenotypes are created equal: covariates of success in e-phenotype specification.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA - 18 Jan 2023

Hamidi Bashir, Flume Patrick A, Simpson Kit N, Alekseyenko Alexander V

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Electronic (e)-phenotype specification by noninformaticist investigators remains a challenge. Although validation of each patient returned by e-phenotype could ensure accuracy of cohort representation, this approach is not practical. Understanding the factors leading to successful e-phenotype specification may reveal generalizable strategies leading to better results. MATERIALS AND METHODS:...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Electronic Health Records
Share to Phenotype

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Research Design

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 36069977
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac157
PMCID: PMC9846689

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Not all phenotypes are created equal: covariates of success in e-phenotype specification.PMID 36069977Read ↗

Validation of electronic medical record-based phenotyping algorithms: results and lessons learned from the eMERGE network.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Desiderata for computable representations of electronic health records-driven phenotype algorithms.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sharing and Reusing Computable Phenotype DefinitionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Scalable and interpretable alternative to chart review for phenotype evaluation using standardized structured data from electronic health records.Semantic proximity Read ↗

PheKB: a catalog and workflow for creating electronic phenotype algorithms for transportability.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using electronic health records for clinical pharmacology research: Challenges and considerations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development and evaluation of a scalable alternative to chart review for phenotype case adjudication using standardized structured data from electronic health recordsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Desiderata for the development of next-generation electronic health record phenotype libraries.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Design patterns for the development of electronic health record-driven phenotype extraction algorithms.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Trends and opportunities in computable clinical phenotyping: A scoping review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Utilization of Computable Phenotypes in Electronic Health Record Research: A Review and Case Study in Atopic Dermatitis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical Informatics Researcher's Desiderata for the Data Content of the Next Generation Electronic Health Record.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.