Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Development and implementation of a RT‐qPCR extraction‐free protocol for the detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 and impact on the turn‐around‐time

13 Jan 2021

Abstract excerpt

The occurrence of the COVID-19 second-wave outbreak in Europe has pushed laboratories performing molecular SARS-CoV-2 tests to increase their throughput and decrease the result rendering time. In this evaluation, we tested for the first time a new, extraction-free, protocol with the Allplex SARS-CoV-2 Assay RT-qPCR kit on a Nimbus platform. Ninety-one samples, of which 71 previously tested positive with RT-qPCR...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Share to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Share to SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 33415765
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26782

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Development and implementation of a RT‐qPCR extraction‐free protocol for the detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 and impact on the turn‐around‐timePMID 33415765Read ↗

Rapid, Reliable and Robust approach for extraction-free RT-PCR based detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical setting to expedite large scale screeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative effects of viral transport medium heat inactivation upon downstream SARS-CoV-2 detection in patient samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

A faster and less costly alternative for RNA extraction of SARS-CoV-2 using proteinase k treatment followed by thermal shockSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating the efficacy of RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 direct approaches in comparison to RNA extractionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating the efficacy of RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 direct approaches in comparison to RNA extractionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of in-house SARS-CoV-2 genome extraction procedures. A need for COVID-19 pandemicSemantic proximity Read ↗

True or false: what are the factors that influence COVID-19 diagnosis by RT-qPCR?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development of a quantitative one-step multiplex RT-qPCR assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a biological matrixSemantic proximity Read ↗

Massive and rapid COVID-19 testing is feasible by extraction-free SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCRSemantic proximity Read ↗

An Open One-Step RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 detectionSemantic proximity Read ↗

RNA Extraction Alternative Method for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular DiagnosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of external quality assessment samples revealed crucial performance differences between commercial RT-PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection when taking extraction methods and real-time-PCR instruments into accountSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.