Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Do assisted reproductive technologies andin vitroembryo culture influence the epigenetic control of imprinted genes and transposable elements in children?

22 Oct 2020

Abstract excerpt

STUDY QUESTION: Do assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and in vitro embryo culture influence the epigenetic control of imprinted genes (IGs) and transposable elements (TEs) in children? SUMMARY ANSWER: Significant differences in the DNA methylation of IGs or transposon families were reported between ART and naturally conceived children, but there was no difference between culture media. WHAT IS KNOWN...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 33319250
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa310

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Do assisted reproductive technologies andin vitroembryo culture influence the epigenetic control of imprinted genes and transposable elements in children?PMID 33319250Read ↗

Assisted Reproductive Technology and EpigeneticsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Similar DNA methylation levels in specific imprinting control regions in children conceived with and without assisted reproductive technology: a cross-sectional studySemantic proximity Read ↗

The epigenetic control of transposable elements and imprinted genes in newborns is affected by the mode of conception: ART versus spontaneous conception without underlying infertilitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Imprinting and assisted reproductive technology.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Do frozen embryo transfers modify the epigenetic control of imprinted genes and transposable elements in newborns compared with fresh embryo transfers and natural conceptions?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Epigenetic Effects of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Human OffspringSemantic proximity Read ↗

Epigenetic changes and assisted reproductive technologiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Epigenetic Risks of Medically Assisted ReproductionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assisted reproductive technologies are associated with limited epigenetic variation at birth that largely resolves by adulthoodSemantic proximity Read ↗

Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technologies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The impact of assisted reproductive technologies on genomic imprinting and imprinting disordersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Contemporary Use of ICSI and Epigenetic Risks to Future GenerationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.