Article
Analytical sensitivity and efficiency comparisons of SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR primer-probe sets.
Nature microbiology - 1 Oct 2020
Vogels Chantal B F, Brito Anderson F, Wyllie Anne L, Fauver Joseph R, Ott Isabel M, Kalinich Chaney C, Petrone Mary E, Casanovas-Massana Arnau, Catherine Muenker M, Moore Adam J, Klein Jonathan, Lu Peiwen, Lu-Culligan Alice, Jiang Xiaodong, Kim Daniel J, Kudo Eriko, Mao Tianyang, Moriyama Miyu, Oh Ji Eun, Park Annsea, Silva Julio, Song Eric, Takahashi Takehiro, Taura Manabu, Tokuyama Maria, Venkataraman Arvind, Weizman Orr-El, Wong Patrick, Yang Yexin, Cheemarla Nagarjuna R, White Elizabeth B, Lapidus Sarah, Earnest Rebecca, Geng Bertie, Vijayakumar Pavithra, Odio Camila, Fournier John, Bermejo Santos, Farhadian Shelli, Dela Cruz Charles S, Iwasaki Akiko, Ko Albert I, Landry Marie L, Foxman Ellen F, Grubaugh Nathan D
Abstract excerpt
The recent spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exemplifies the critical need for accurate and rapid diagnostic assays to prompt clinical and public health interventions. Currently, several quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) assays are being used by clinical, research and public health laboratories. However, it is currently unclear whether results from different...
Read the complete abstract on PubMedTopics
Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.
