Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Using Monte Carlo method to include polygenic effects in calculation of SNP-BLUP model reliability.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Jun 2020

Ben Zaabza H, Mäntysaari E A, Strandén I

Abstract excerpt

An SNP-BLUP model is computationally scalable even for large numbers of genotyped animals. When genetic variation cannot be completely captured by SNP markers, a more accurate model is obtained by fitting a residual polygenic effect (RPG) as well. However, inclusion of the RPG effect increases the size of the SNP-BLUP mixed model equations (MME) by the number of genotyped animals. Consequently, the calculation of...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Genome
Share to Models, Genetic

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Monte Carlo Method

Share to Multifactorial Inheritance

Share to Pedigree

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 32253036
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-17255

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Using Monte Carlo method to include polygenic effects in calculation of SNP-BLUP model reliability.PMID 32253036Read ↗

A computationally efficient method for approximating reliabilities in large-scale single-step genomic prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Approximating prediction error variances and reliabilities in a multiple-trait genomic prediction model using Monte Carlo sampling.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Breeding value reliabilities for multiple-trait single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy of breeding values when using and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breeding value estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Best linear unbiased prediction of genomic breeding values using a trait-specific marker-derived relationship matrix.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Polygenic modeling with bayesian sparse linear mixed models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Marker effect p-values for single-step GWAS with the algorithm for proven and young in large genotyped populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Methods to approximate reliabilities in single-step genomic evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Efficiency of genomic selection using Bayesian multi-marker models for traits selected to reflect a wide range of heritabilities and frequencies of detected quantitative traits loci in mice.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.