Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models.

Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie - 1 Jun 2017

Strandén I, Matilainen K, Aamand G P, Mäntysaari E A

Abstract excerpt

Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) requires a dense matrix of the size equal to the number of genotyped animals in the coefficient matrix of mixed model equations (MME). When the number of genotyped animals is high, solving time of MME will be dominated by this matrix. The matrix is the difference of two inverse relationship matrices: genomic (G) and pedigree (A22 ). Different approaches were used to ease...

Topics

Algorithms
Animals
Cattle
Computer Simulation
Female
Fertility
Genomics
Genotype
Linear Models
Male
Models, Genetic
Pedigree

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Selective Breeding

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 28508482
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12257

Genes

MME

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 31 Aug 2026.

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

0

discussions

0

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models.PMID 28508482Read ↗

Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-Step Genomic Evaluations from Theory to Practice: Using SNP Chips and Sequence Data in BLUPF90.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Efficient large-scale single-step evaluations and indirect genomic prediction of genotyped selection candidates.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Efficient single-step genomic evaluation for a multibreed beef cattle population having many genotyped animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparing algorithms to approximate accuracies for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Practical implementation of genetic groups in single-step genomic evaluations with Woodbury matrix identity-based genomic relationship inverse.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Breeding value reliabilities for multiple-trait single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sparse single-step genomic BLUP in crossbreeding schemes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

All-breed single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor evaluations for fertility traits in US dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.