Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Marker effect p-values for single-step GWAS with the algorithm for proven and young in large genotyped populations.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE - 22 Aug 2024

Leite Natália Galoro, Bermann Matias, Tsuruta Shogo, Misztal Ignacy, Lourenco Daniela

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects can be backsolved from ssGBLUP genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) and used for genome-wide association studies (ssGWAS). However, obtaining p-values for those SNP effects relies on the inversion of dense matrices, which poses computational limitations in large genotyped populations. In this study, we present a method to approximate SNP p-values for...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Algorithms
Share to Breeding

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Markers

Share to Genome-Wide Association Study

Share to Genotype

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 39174924
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-024-00925-3
PMCID: PMC11340074

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Marker effect p-values for single-step GWAS with the algorithm for proven and young in large genotyped populations.PMID 39174924Read ↗

Indirect predictions with a large number of genotyped animals using the algorithm for proven and young.Semantic proximity Read ↗

On the equivalence between marker effect models and breeding value models and direct genomic values with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Incorporation of causative quantitative trait nucleotides in single-step GBLUP.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Core-dependent changes in genomic predictions using the Algorithm for Proven and Young in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Theoretical accuracy for indirect predictions based on SNP effects from single-step GBLUP.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comprehensive study on size and definition of the core group in the proven and young algorithm for single-step GBLUP.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Is single-step genomic REML with the algorithm for proven and young more computationally efficient when less generations of data are present?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dimensionality of genomic information and performance of the Algorithm for Proven and Young for different livestock species.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.