Association of SP-B gene 9306 A/G polymorphism (rs7316) and risk of RDS.

doi:10.1080/14767058.2017.1359829

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Back to search

Article

Association of SP-B gene 9306 A/G polymorphism (rs7316) and risk of RDS.

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians - 1 Nov 2018

Fatahi Neda, Niknafs Nikoo, Kalani Majid, Dalili Hosein, Shariat Mamak, Amini Elaheh, Esmaeilnia Shirvani Tahereh, Hardani Amir Kamal, Taheritafti Roya, Ghasemi-Fakhr Nasrin, Ghadami Mohsen, Tavakkoly-Bazzaz Javad, Rashidi-Nezhad Ramin, Nayeri Fatemeh, Rashidi-Nezhad Ali

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a severe pulmonary disease predominantly affects preterm newborns. Polymorphisms of surfactant-protein genes have been mostly evaluated as the candidate contributors in genetics of RDS. However the results are divers in different studies. We aimed at investigating the association of surfactant protein B (SPB) gene 9306 A/G polymorphism (rs7316) with RDS...

Topics

Case-Control Studies
Female
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Humans
Infant, Newborn

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Infant, Premature

Iran

Male

Polymorphism, Genetic

Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein B

Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn

Source

Open in PubMed

Identifiers

PMID: 28738720
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1359829

Genes

SFTPB

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 30 Aug 2026.

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

discussions

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.