Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Single-reviewer electronic phenotyping validation in operational settings: Comparison of strategies and recommendations.

Journal of biomedical informatics - 1 Feb 2017

Kukhareva Polina, Staes Catherine, Noonan Kevin W, Mueller Heather L, Warner Phillip, Shields David E, Weeks Howard, Kawamoto Kensaku

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVE: Develop evidence-based recommendations for single-reviewer validation of electronic phenotyping results in operational settings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled study to evaluate whether electronic phenotyping results should be used to support manual chart review during single-reviewer electronic phenotyping validation (N=3104). We evaluated the accuracy, duration and cost of...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Algorithms
Share to Electronic Health Records

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Phenotype

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 27956265
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.12.004

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Single-reviewer electronic phenotyping validation in operational settings: Comparison of strategies and recommendations.PMID 27956265Read ↗

An online tool for correcting verification bias when validating electronic phenotyping algorithmsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Improving reporting standards for phenotyping algorithm in biomedical research: 5 fundamental dimensions.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Validation of electronic medical record-based phenotyping algorithms: results and lessons learned from the eMERGE network.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Scalable and interpretable alternative to chart review for phenotype evaluation using standardized structured data from electronic health records.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Trends and opportunities in computable clinical phenotyping: A scoping review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Leveraging undecided cases in chart-reviewed phenotypes to enhance EHR-based association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Combining billing codes, clinical notes, and medications from electronic health records provides superior phenotyping performance.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Impact of "Possible Patients" on Phenotyping Algorithms: Electronic Phenotype Algorithms Can Only Be Reproduced by Sharing Detailed Annotation Criteria.Semantic proximity Read ↗

PheValuator 2.0: Methodological improvements for the PheValuator approach to semi-automated phenotype algorithm evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Analyzing the heterogeneity of rule-based EHR phenotyping algorithms in CALIBER and the UK BiobankSemantic proximity Read ↗

PhenoFit: a framework for determining computable phenotyping algorithm fitness for purpose and reuse.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Systematic Process for Assessing Fitness-for-Purpose of Health Outcomes for Computable Phenotyping with Electronic Health Record DataSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.