Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

On the distance of genetic relationships and the accuracy of genomic prediction in pig breeding.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE - 1 Aug 2014

Meuwissen Theo H E, Odegard Jorgen, Andersen-Ranberg Ina, Grindflek Eli

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: With the advent of genomic selection, alternative relationship matrices are used in animal breeding, which vary in their coverage of distant relationships due to old common ancestors. Relationships based on pedigree (A) and linkage analysis (GLA) cover only recent relationships because of the limited depth of the known pedigree. Relationships based on identity-by-state (G) include relationships up to...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Genomics
Share to Haplotypes

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Pedigree

Share to Quantitative Trait Loci

Share to Selection, Genetic

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 25158793
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-46-49
PMCID: PMC4237822

Genes

GLA

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

On the distance of genetic relationships and the accuracy of genomic prediction in pig breeding.PMID 25158793Read ↗

Assessment of relationships between pigs based on pedigree and genomic information.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of methods to estimate genomic relationships using pedigree and markers in livestock populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimates of the actual relationship between half-sibs in a pig population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comprehensive study on size and definition of the core group in the proven and young algorithm for single-step GBLUP.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The importance of identity-by-state information for the accuracy of genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sparse single-step method for genomic evaluation in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Including crossbred pigs in the genomic relationship matrix through utilization of both linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Haplotype genomic prediction of phenotypic values based on chromosome distance and gene boundaries using low-coverage sequencing in Duroc pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic evaluation using SNP- and haplotype-based genomic relationship matrices in a closed line of Duroc pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.