Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE - 5 Jan 2011

Forni Selma, Aguilar Ignacio, Misztal Ignacy

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: The incorporation of genomic coefficients into the numerator relationship matrix allows estimation of breeding values using all phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information simultaneously. In such a single-step procedure, genomic and pedigree-based relationships have to be compatible. As there are many options to create genomic relationships, there is a question of which is optimal and what the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Litter Size
Share to Models, Genetic
Share to Pedigree

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Phenotype

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 21208445
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-1
PMCID: PMC3022661

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information.PMID 21208445Read ↗

Crossbreed evaluations in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor using adjusted realized relationship matrices.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of models for missing pedigree in single-step genomic prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of relationships between pigs based on pedigree and genomic information.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of methods to estimate genomic relationships using pedigree and markers in livestock populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Core-dependent changes in genomic predictions using the Algorithm for Proven and Young in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sparse single-step genomic BLUP in crossbreeding schemes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comprehensive study on size and definition of the core group in the proven and young algorithm for single-step GBLUP.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.