Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Adapting the coping in deliberation (CODE) framework: a multi-method approach in the context of familial ovarian cancer risk management.

Patient education and counseling - 1 Nov 2014

Witt Jana, Elwyn Glyn, Wood Fiona, Rogers Mark T, Menon Usha, Brain Kate

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVE: To test whether the coping in deliberation (CODE) framework can be adapted to a specific preference-sensitive medical decision: risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in women at increased risk of ovarian cancer. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search to identify issues important to women during deliberations about RRSO. Three focus groups with patients (most were...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adaptation, Psychological
Share to Choice Behavior

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Focus Groups

Share to Interviews as Topic

Share to Models, Psychological

Share to Patient Participation

Share to Qualitative Research

Share to Risk Management

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 25064250
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.004

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Adapting the coping in deliberation (CODE) framework: a multi-method approach in the context of familial ovarian cancer risk management.PMID 25064250Read ↗

Understanding risk perception and risk-reducing decision-making for surgery among individuals with a genetic predisposition to epithelial ovarian cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Psychosocial Impact of the Decision to Undergo Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy Surgery in BRCA Mutation Carriers and the Role of Physician-Patient Communication.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Preserving the self: the process of decision making about hereditary breast cancer and ovarian cancer risk reduction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of a patient decision aid for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers choosing an ovarian cancer prevention strategy.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Exploring the role of a multidisciplinary hereditary gynecologic oncology clinic in epithelial ovarian cancer risk-reducing surgical decision-making practices: A mixed-methods study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

An exploratory qualitative study of women's perceptions of risk management options for familial ovarian cancer: implications for informed decision making.Semantic proximity Read ↗

What matters most: A Q-methodology study of the viewpoints of women diagnosed with a BRCA gene mutation on person-centred care.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Seeking balance: decision support needs of women without cancer and a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Relevance of the common-sense model for people living with a genetic predisposition for breast and ovarian cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

There is no decision to make: experiences and attitudes toward treatment-focused genetic testing among women diagnosed with ovarian cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Making Sense of a Health Threat: Illness Representations, Coping, and Psychological Distress among BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Decision-making for bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy for an increased lifetime breast cancer risk: A qualitative metasynthesis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.