Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

What matters most: A Q-methodology study of the viewpoints of women diagnosed with a BRCA gene mutation on person-centred care.

Patient education and counseling - 1 Apr 2026

Witte Leonie Emilia, van Diepen Cornelia, Cramm Jane Murray

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVES: Women diagnosed with BRCA mutations face elevated risks of breast and ovarian cancer. Managing inherited risk involves complex, value-laden decisions, yet health services frequently overlook the distinct challenges these women encounter. Person-centred care (PCC) may complement medical management by addressing what matters most to patients. To inform PCC delivery for women diagnosed with BRCA, this...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breast Neoplasms
Share to Decision Making

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genes, BRCA1

Share to Genes, BRCA2

Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Share to Netherlands

Share to Ovarian Neoplasms

Share to Qualitative Research

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 41576582
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2026.109488

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

What matters most: A Q-methodology study of the viewpoints of women diagnosed with a BRCA gene mutation on person-centred care.PMID 41576582Read ↗

Seeking balance: decision support needs of women without cancer and a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cancer risk management decision making for BRCA+ women.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Constructing the Medical Humanities gaze.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Preserving the self: the process of decision making about hereditary breast cancer and ovarian cancer risk reduction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Examining the communication work of women who have tested BRCA-positive: "I feel this responsibility to let people know".Semantic proximity Read ↗

In their own words: treating very young BRCA1/2 mutation-positive women with care and caution.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Moving In and Out of the What-Ifs: The Experiences of Unaffected Women Living in Families Where a Breast Cancer 1 or 2 Genetic Mutation Was Not Found.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Involvement and Influence of Healthcare Providers, Family Members, and Other Mutation Carriers in the Cancer Risk Management Decision-Making Process of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Beating the biological clock: the compressed family life cycle of young women with BRCA gene alterations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Maximising survival: the main concern of women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer who undergo genetic testing for BRCA1/2.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Adapting the coping in deliberation (CODE) framework: a multi-method approach in the context of familial ovarian cancer risk management.Semantic proximity Read ↗

How do women experience a change in their clinically-derived breast cancer risk estimates: views from a UK Family History Risk and Prevention ClinicSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.