Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

General practitioner attitudes to direct-to-consumer genetic testing in New Zealand.

The New Zealand medical journal - 26 Oct 2012

Ram Sanyogita, Russell Bruce, Gubb Mary, Taylor Rebekah, Butler Cassandra, Khan Imran, Shelling Andrew

Abstract excerpt

AIM: The aim of the study was to explore the attitudes of general practitioners (GPs) towards direct to consumer (DTC) genetic testing and elicit their perceptions of the risks and benefits associated with DTC genetic testing. METHOD: A postal questionnaire was mailed to a national random sample of 300 registered GPs from a list provided by the New Zealand Medical Council. Non-responders were followed up with an...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Age Factors
Share to Attitude of Health Personnel

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Cross-Sectional Studies

Share to Genetic Counseling

Share to Internet

Share to New Zealand

Share to Sex Factors

Share to Surveys and Questionnaires

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 23242394

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

General practitioner attitudes to direct-to-consumer genetic testing in New Zealand.PMID 23242394Read ↗

Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: perceptions, problems, and policy responses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Direct‐to‐consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian publicSemantic proximity Read ↗

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 409: Direct-to-Consumer Marketing of Genetic TestingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of direct-to-consumer genetic testing on Australian clinical genetics servicesSemantic proximity Read ↗

State of play in direct-to-consumer genetic testing for lifestyle-related diseases: market, marketing content, user experiences and regulation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests and Canadian Genetic Counselors: A Pilot Exploration of Professional Roles in Response to Novel BiotechnologiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of Direct‐to‐Consumer Genetic Tests on Health Behaviour and Anxiety: A Survey of Consumers and Potential ConsumersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic counseling following direct‐to consumer genetic testing: Consumer perspectivesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosure of genetic information to at-risk relatives: privacy law and professional guidance in New Zealand.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Consumer Perspectives on Access to Direct‐to‐Consumer Genetic Testing: Role of Demographic Factors and the Testing ExperienceSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.